My Recent Introduction to Everything GOOD

What’s the difference between doing well and doing GOOD? Founded in 2006, GOOD Magazine is an innovative, bimonthly publication “for people who give a damn.” Providing comprehensive articles on sustainability, social change, politics, business, health, technology, media; you name it, it’s GOOD. The range of content provides a stimulating read for anyone, translating into interesting conversation around the water cooler (yes, I do that).
I am enamored with GOOD. Every page is worth reading, even the ads, which are more like pieces of advertorial, providing insight on products and companies I all of a sudden want to support and learn more about. While the advertising is almost reason enough to subscribe, the most alluring feature GOOD exhibits is that they donate 100 percent of membership fees to the nonprofit organization of your choice; to one of the 12 nonprofit groups the publication has partnered with in an effort to raise one million dollars by the end of 2008. You’re also given the choice to donate between one and 1,000 dollars, so if you can only afford five dollars, $10 or $20, you’re golden! If you choose to donate more, feel free.
I recently subscribed to GOOD and chose 826 National to receive my donation. 826 National provides free educational assistance for in-need students. Other organizations include Slow Food USA, Ashoka and IAVA. It’s a great way to spend your money this holiday season. I’m getting five-dollar-subscriptions for friends and family members. Granted it’s only five dollars per organization, every little bit counts, and it’s also a way to introduce people to organizations tied to their social interests, ideally fostering relationships with nonprofits that will last for years to come. And if I’ve spoiled the surprise for anyone I know reading this, I figure the cause is worth giving away the secret.
The following are just a few of the interesting things I’ve learned from GOOD’s Nov./Dec. issue. I’ll discuss each one in further detail in the next week:
Do well, by doing GOOD.
CNN Taps Comedy-News Market
I’m gonna go ahead and generalize three major television news outlets by saying FOX News falls to the right of the political spectrum, MSNBC stands to the left, and CNN is…moderately liberal. Granted Wolf Blitzer is the spitting image of stone-cold objectivity, I do think the network caters to liberal audiences at times. One example of this is CNN’s recent announcement of a new, “unconventional” show hosted by comedian D.L. Hughley. I’m curious if this programming move will affect audience perceptions of CNN. Is the popularity of the comedy-news genre rubbing off on traditional television news outlets?
An article on CNN.com mentions that Hughley’s new show, “D.L. Hughley Breaks the News,” is similar to “the late-night talk shows of Jay Leno and David Letterman more than Jon Stewart’s ‘Daily Show,’” including an opening monologue and interviews with reporters and politicians. I’m looking forward to the show, but I don’t think comedic interviews with correspondents live at the scene in Kuala Lumpur provide constructive commentary for a network known for its innovation in delivering the facts. If Dr. Sanjay Gupta cracks a joke remotely related to obesity in America, will viewers remember they’re watching a comedy-news program and disregard the harmless jest, or will they discredit Dr. Gupta for turning a serious matter into a petty remark?
There’s no denying comedy-news programs affect viewers’ perceptions of public figures and current events. What affect will CNN’s comedy-news produce? We’re all aware of SNL’s recent slew of Palin parodies, and Jon Stewart’s been the poster boy for fake news that hits hard. Personally, I think Stephen Colbert triumphs for leading conservative politicians to believe he speaks the pure and utter truth on his satirical show, “The Colbert Report” (if you haven’t seen Colbert’s speech at the 2006 White House Correspondent’s Dinner, it’s some of the most uncomfortably hilarious footage you’ll ever see).
Shows like “The Colbert Report,” David Alan Grier’s “Chocolate News,” and SNL’s latest “Weekend Update Thursdays” spinoff reserve the right to poke fun at our nation’s shortcomings and give outlandish opinions of politicians because they’re written for pure entertainment and hosted on comedy-friendly networks. Stewart said it best on “Crossfire” regarding the differences between his show and real news: “You’re on CNN. The show that leads into me is puppets making crank phone calls!”
While “D.L. Hughley Breaks the News” will steer clear of mimicking Stewart’s “Daily Show,” will it soften CNN’s reputation for reporting concrete facts? Past surveys show that more young people get their news from “Saturday Night Live” and Jon Stewart’s “Daily Show,” than from traditional news sources. The youth vote in this year’s presidential election is heavily for Obama. If comedy-news programs are the number one source liberal youths turn to for news, will CNN blatantly cater to this audience for good ratings, or will Hughley’s new show target both sides of the aisle? There’s never been a successful comedy-news program on a news-only network, so it’s hard to say how the new show will be received.
Life As An Intern During Post-Bailout America
Hello. My name is Scott, and I’m an intern.
It all happened so fast. After moving to Portland, Ore., in April, I landed a job at a restaurant, while continuing to pursue an internship in the agency world. By June, I landed the quintessential position: a paid PR internship with a prominent Portland-area advertising agency. All was going according to plan. The restaurant was constantly busy and the internship provided the perfect wages to set aside into my savings.
As autumn approached, the leaves began to droop along with the stock market. Because my restaurant is a seasonal establishment situated on a lake, the steady crew of lake-goers dissipated. After getting called off every shift this past week, I realized it’s time to quit my restaurant job and find a different one. But where? Who in their right mind is hiring at this point in our economy’s downturn? Oregon lost 17,300 jobs in the last two months. Less people are eating out. My confidence in finding a job in the food service industry is waning.
My current position with the ad agency stays strong, but interning during an economic crisis makes you feel expendable, for purely budgetary reasons. If clients discontinue services, the money stops rolling in. Who needs support-level employees if there’s nothing left to support?
While living rent-free with the ‘rents, like a number of Millennials seem to do, I’m privileged that most of my money is staying intact, considering I wouldn’t be able to rent with the wages I’m not bringing in. As part of one of the largest uninsured populations in America, my yet-to-be-extracted wisdom teeth do a painstaking double-take every time I hear how worse the economy is getting, paired with how awful our health care system has become. While no full-time job (and benefits) seems to be in sight, I realize that my complaints are one of many among a nation of people plagued by the same, if not worse, conditions I’m experiencing.
On the upside, not all is lost for the nation’s employment pool. Those “green-collar” jobs Obama and others keep mentioning have finally made tangible headway into Oregon’s job market. With the skill set already in place from the survivors of the semiconductor industry, I believe Oregon is going to lead the nation in solar cell manufacturing. Portland is already the “greenest” city according to several publications (and even eastern nations). While I have no intention to join the manufacturing workforce, I think living in Oregon for the next five years (at least) is going to be a stimulating time for the economy, the environment, and the state’s overall morale.
John Krasinski Intern Story















